![Animal crossing new leaf rom dump](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)
![discount photo supreme discount photo supreme](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YqQXLE15zb4/XyBn5wHrrAI/AAAAAAAAHa8/LyeKb0P0p0QtzOSPTg1iBlQs0SuXZC_YgCLcBGAsYHQ/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/SUPREME-DESKTOP-WALLPAPER-HD-1080.jpg)
District Judge Vaughn Walker, who presided over the trial, recorded the proceedings, but said at the time that the recordings for for court-related purposes and not intended for public release. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Orrick’s ruling, finding that social conservatives who had supported Proposition 8 had failed to prove their claim that releasing the tapes could lead to harm or harassment of anyone involved in the case.ĭuring the original Proposition 8 trial, the Supreme Court rejected a request to allow the trial to be publicly broadcast, on the grounds that doing so was not allowed under the San Francisco federal court’s rules. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected a request to permanently seal the videotapes from the trial, noting that transcripts of the trial had already been released, without any harm befalling the individuals who had argued against legalizing same-sex nuptials. The high court declined to hear an appeal of a lower court decision from 2020, in which U.S. Supreme Court rejected a request from opponents of same-sex marriage who had sought to block video of the 2010 trial that led to the overturn of California’s ban on the practice, also known as Proposition 8. Supreme Court – Photo by Todd Franson.Įarlier this week, the U.S.
![discount photo supreme discount photo supreme](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/HpMNPzp4FCI/maxresdefault.jpg)
Opponents of the anti-gay Proposition 8 gather outside the U.S.
![Animal crossing new leaf rom dump](https://cdn1.cdnme.se/5447227/9-3/7_64e61dfbddf2b36517292648.png)